A question I hear from HR and HSE managers, usually phrased as a worry: "We follow ISO 45003 at group level — does that cover us for PRisMA?" The short answer is no. The longer answer is more useful, because the two frameworks are not competitors. One is the thinking; the other is the Malaysian implementation of it.

Two documents, two jobs

ISO 45003:2021 is the international guidance standard for psychological health and safety at work: the document that tells organisations how to manage psychosocial risk within an OHS management system. It is principles-based and deliberately instrument-agnostic: it describes what good management of psychosocial risk looks like, but hands you no questionnaire and no cut-off table.

PRisMA 2024 is Malaysia's answer to the "how, exactly?" question. Published by DOSH, it operationalises the ISO 45003 approach for Malaysian workplaces with specific, validated instruments: the LEO26 screening tool, the EPC23 employer checklist, and the PRiMA action-plan table, run by a trained person on a defined eleven-step process, with set reassessment intervals. The guideline itself states that LEO26 was developed in alignment with ISO 45003:2021.

PRisMA 2024 ISO 45003:2021
What it isMalaysian DOSH guideline with defined instrumentsInternational guidance standard for managing psychosocial risk
Issued byDOSH / JKKP Malaysia (2024)International Organization for Standardization (2021)
Weight in MalaysiaThe recognised framework for the OSHA 2022 dutyVoluntary; signals good practice to group HQ, auditors, ESG reviewers
ToolsLEO26, EPC23, PRiMA — published, validated, scoredPrinciples and clauses; no prescribed instrument
Who runs itA trained Psychosocial Trained Person (PTP)No defined role; typically the OHS management system owner
OutputRisk status per work unit + action plan + reassessment cycleA management-system approach within ISO 45001

The compliance question, answered plainly

Under the Occupational Safety and Health (Amendment) Act 2022, Malaysian employers have a statutory duty covering employees' mental health and wellbeing, and PRisMA 2024 is the framework DOSH has published for meeting it. An ISO 45003-aligned group policy, however sincere, does not produce LEO26 work-unit risk statuses, does not involve a PTP, and will not look like compliance when DOSH asks what assessment you conducted.

The reverse is also true, and multinationals should note it. A PRisMA report satisfies the Malaysian regulator but is not, by itself, an ISO 45003-conformant management system. If your group reports against ISO frameworks, PRisMA slots in as the local risk-assessment mechanism within that bigger structure. ISO 45001 certification does not automatically cover psychosocial risk either — that gap is precisely why ISO 45003 was written.

Rule of thumb: PRisMA is what you do for DOSH. ISO 45003 is how you frame it for headquarters. A Malaysian site of a multinational usually needs both, and they share the same underlying work.

Doing both without doing the work twice

The efficient sequence starts with PRisMA, because its outputs are concrete: work-unit risk statuses, an EPC23 gap review, a prioritised action plan. Those artefacts then become the evidence base for the ISO 45003 clauses on hazard identification, risk assessment and planning. I deliver this as a pair: the PRisMA 2024 assessment for the regulatory layer, and an ISO 45003 workshop for the management-system layer, so the same data serves both masters.

Further reading & sources

On this site: PRisMA 2024 assessment service · ISO 45003 workshops · LEO26, explained · What is a PTP?

External: DOSH Malaysia · ISO 45003:2021

Need the regulatory layer and the management-system layer handled together?

Start With a PRisMA Assessment →

Dr. Kirath Sidhu (Dr. Harkirath Singh Harbans Singh) is a registered Occupational Health Doctor, certified Psychosocial Trained Person (DOSH PTP-291/26) and ISO 45003-certified practitioner. He provides PRisMA 2024 assessments and ISO 45003 workshops for employers across Penang and Malaysia through ASP Medical Group.